Bruce Swander
02-23-2005, 01:34
Looking at this incident (and many others like it), I'm confused as to why these men weren't coded as MIA's during the time they were missing - or at least coded as Died while Missing (A3). Can anyone tell me what status the Unit had them in for a year, and what their families were told? It doesn't appear that there were eyewitnesses to know if they were shot down, survived and captured, etc, - but their names do not show up on the PMSEA MIA lists. Was there a 1stMAW Directive in place to wait for a year before someone was declared MIA?
Reviewing the KIA Incidents, there are many such cases like this where sites/remains weren't found for years later...but none of the names show up on the official MIA lists kept. Families had to be told something - were they 'presumed dead' and benefits stopped on the day of the crash?
There has to be some type of logical (?) answer to this that I'm missing and would like to get a better understanding of it.
Reviewing the KIA Incidents, there are many such cases like this where sites/remains weren't found for years later...but none of the names show up on the official MIA lists kept. Families had to be told something - were they 'presumed dead' and benefits stopped on the day of the crash?
There has to be some type of logical (?) answer to this that I'm missing and would like to get a better understanding of it.